Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator

Concluded original arbitration proceedings:

About

Open this in NEW TAB
ISDS data set in excel format (as of 31 December 2023)

ISDS Navigator

The UNCTAD Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator – the ISDS Navigator – is maintained by UNCTAD’s IIA Section. The ISDS Navigator contains information about known international arbitration cases initiated by investors against States pursuant to international investment agreements (IIAs). Such arbitrations are also referred to as treaty-based investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) cases.

Please cite as: UNCTAD, Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator, available at https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement

UNCTAD's Work Programme on International Investment Agreements (IIAs) actively assists policymakers, government officials and other IIA stakeholders to reform IIAs with a view to making them more conducive to sustainable development and inclusive growth.

International investment rulemaking is taking place at the bilateral, regional, interregional and multilateral levels. It requires policymakers, negotiators, civil society and other stakeholders to be well informed about foreign direct investment, international investment agreements (IIAs) and their impact on sustainable development.

Main goals of UNCTAD’s Work Programme on IIAs

• Reform the international investment agreements (IIAs) regime to enhance its sustainable development dimension,

• Provide comprehensive analysis on key issues arising from the complexity of the international investment regime,

• Develop a wide range of tools to support the formulation of more balanced international investment policies.

The three pillars of activities

• Research and policy analysis: monitoring trends, identifying key emerging issues and providing cutting-edge knowledge on IIAs from a sustainable development perspective,

• Technical assistance: delivering trainings, seminars and workshops; conducting IIA and model BIT reviews; offering ad-hoc advice to strengthen the capacity of beneficiaries in handling the complexities of the IIA regime,

• Intergovernmental consensus-building: exchanging and sharing best practices and experience with the view to fostering global investment governance.

For further information, please contact us via the online contact form.
Methodology

Open this in NEW TAB

Disclaimer

The ISDS Navigator includes information about publicly known IIA-based international investor-State arbitration proceedings. As some proceedings (or certain aspects of proceedings) remain confidential, the information contained in the Navigator cannot be deemed exhaustive.

While every effort is made to keep the information up to date and complete, the material is provided without any guarantees or warranties as to its accuracy or completeness. UNCTAD assumes no responsibility for eventual errors or omissions in these data.

We welcome any additional information or clarifications on specific cases as well as suggestions to improve the Navigator. Please contact us using the online contact form.

Cases included in the Navigator

• an international arbitration between an investor and a State;

• fully or partially based on an IIA, such as a bilateral investment treaty or the investment chapter of a free trade agreement (not included are investor-State disputes that are solely based on contracts or on domestic investment legislation);

• submitted to arbitration through a notice of arbitration or a request for arbitration, and upon registration of such request if applicable (not included are cases where a disputing party has only notified the other party of the existence of a dispute or signalled its intention to submit a claim, but has not yet commenced the arbitration).

Sources of information and frequency of updating

The information included in the Navigator is collected from publicly available sources. Primary sources (i.e. official documents relating to the case and information provided by the administering institutions) are the main and preferred source of information. Secondary sources, such as specialized reporting services and other sources deemed reliable, are used to supplement primary sources and/or obtain case information otherwise unavailable.
The Navigator is updated on a regular, typically biannual, basis. The date of the last update is displayed on the Navigator’s home page.

Methodological notes for the recording of data

Full case name
The full case name is recorded as it appears in the official case documents and as it is registered at the administering institution if applicable (listing the claimants in alphabetical order). If there are more than five claimants in the case, the names of all claimants can be replaced by the name of the first three claimants followed by the words “and others”.

Short case name
The short case name is ascribed by UNCTAD. Typically it is the first word of a corporate claimant’s name, an abbreviation of the corporate claimant’s name, or the last name of a natural-person claimant “v.” the short version of the respondent State’s name.

If the Navigator includes more than one case with the exact same name, then “(I)” is added to the case name of the earlier case, and a “(II)”, “(III)”, etc. is added to the name of each subsequent case.

Year of initiation
This is the year in which the notice of arbitration / request for arbitration was submitted by the claimant. For arbitrations brought under the ICSID Convention Arbitration Rules or ICSID Additional Facilities (AF) Rules, the year in which the claim was registered by ICSID is used.

Applicable IIA
This is the IIA(s) pursuant to which the claimant initiated the arbitral proceedings.

Arbitral rules
These are the arbitral rules in accordance with which the proceedings are conducted. Proceedings that are not subject to any existing set of arbitral rules, i.e. where the arbitral tribunal determines procedural rules, are marked “None (ad hoc)”.

Administering institution
This is the institution that provides administrative support for the arbitral proceedings. When the proceedings are subject to arbitral rules of a certain arbitral institution (e.g. SCC or ICC), the relevant institution administers that case. In ad hoc arbitrations or those that are subject to non-institutional arbitral rules (e.g. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules), the parties may request any arbitral institution to administer their case (e.g. PCA). Proceedings may also be conducted without being administered by any institution.

Common abbreviations for administering institutions:

• CRCICA: Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration
• ICC: International Chamber of Commerce (International Court of Arbitration)
• ICSID: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
• LCIA: London Court of International Arbitration
• MCCI: Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry
• PCA: Permanent Court of Arbitration
• SCC: Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (Arbitration Institute)

Details of investment and summary of the dispute
The details of investment are presented as argued by the claimant, unless otherwise expressly identified by an arbitral tribunal in its decisions or awards.

The summary of the dispute describes in very general terms the conduct allegedly in breach of IIA obligations as argued by the claimant (non-exhaustive).

Economic sector and subsector
This refers to the economic sector to which the investment at issue allegedly belongs. The structure of economic activities follows the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Rev.4 (UN ISIC Rev.4).

Status/Outcome of original proceedings
This refers to the current status of the original arbitration proceedings.

• Decided in favour of State: the tribunal dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction or found that the respondent State has not committed any breach of the applicable IIA.

• Decided in favour of investor: the tribunal found that the respondent State committed one or more breaches of the applicable IIA and awarded monetary compensation or non-pecuniary relief to the claimant investor.

• Decided in favour of neither party (liability found but no damages awarded): the arbitral tribunal found that the respondent State committed one or more breaches of the applicable IIA but did not award monetary compensation or non-pecuniary relief to the claimant investor.

• Settled: the disputing parties settled the case and the arbitral proceedings were discontinued for that reason.

• Discontinued: the arbitration was discontinued for any reason other than due to a (known) settlement. This includes discontinuance as a result of non-payment of arbitration fees, in order to pursue litigation in another forum, or for any other reason (including for unknown reasons).

• Pending: the arbitration proceedings are pending. A case remains pending if any of the following elements remain to be decided: jurisdiction, liability (merits), compensation. The case remains pending, for instance, if a State is found to have breached one or more IIA obligations (liability) but no award on damages has been issued yet.

Additional notes:

• The Navigator only records treaty-based disputes or treaty-based aspects of "mixed" disputes. In treaty-based cases that are simultaneously contract-based or based on national investment law ("mixed" disputes), a case is deemed concluded (for purposes of the Navigator) if the tribunal dismissed the case on jurisdiction or finds no breach of the IIA, even if it proceeds to adjudicate the contract- or statutory-based claims.

• Cases in which a final award has been rendered but which are later subject to follow-on (post-award) proceedings (e.g. ICSID annulment proceedings or domestic judicial review), are marked according to the outcome of the original arbitral proceeding (i.e. not as “Pending”).

Arbitral decisions rendered
These are decisions rendered by an arbitral tribunal. Included are those decisions that concern the substance of the case and affect the final outcome. In particular, these include decisions (awards) on jurisdictional issues, liability (merits) and damages, including arbitrators’ individual opinions where these were issued. Discontinuance orders and settlement agreements are also recorded if such information is available.

Not included are any other (supplementary) arbitral decisions, e.g. concerning provisional measures or decisions regarding requests for disqualification of arbitrators. Similarly, procedural orders issued by arbitral tribunals are not included. To access a full list of documentation available with respect to a case, users are invited to use (i) the link to the case page on http://italaw.com, and/or (ii) links to the websites of governments and/or arbitral institutions provided in the “Additional information” section.

Amounts claimed and awarded
Amount claimed refers to the amount of monetary compensation claimed by the investor, not including interest, legal costs or costs of arbitration.

Amount awarded refers to the amount of monetary compensation awarded by the arbitral tribunal to the claimant, not including interest, legal costs or costs of arbitration.

For proceedings that end in a settlement, the amount of compensation that the State agreed to pay to the claimant under the terms of settlement (if known) is recorded in this section.

Amounts are recorded in the currency used by the claimant/tribunal. The list of currencies in the Navigator follows the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4217 code list.

To enable comparisons between cases, all amounts are also converted to US dollars. For the purposes of such conversion, the OANDA Historical Currency Converter is being used; the date of conversion is the date of the document or other source from which the information was obtained (e.g. the date in which the request for arbitration containing this amount was submitted or the date of the final award).

Whenever possible, information about amounts claimed and awarded is obtained from primary sources such as the arbitration documents. Otherwise, it is derived from other publicly available sources that are deemed reliable. In some cases, the approximate amount may be recorded to give a broad indication of the dispute’s magnitude. As a general rule, a rounded figure (to the nearest hundred thousand) of the amount claimed or awarded is provided.

If the claimant provides more than one valuation of damages claimed, the highest of these amounts is recorded.

IIA breaches alleged and found
Information about breaches alleged is primarily derived from the claimant’s request of arbitration, claimant’s memorials and/or arbitral decisions. When the relevant case documentation is not publicly available, information about breaches alleged may be obtained from other public sources that are deemed reliable.

Information about breaches found is primarily derived from the arbitral decisions. When the relevant decision is not publicly available, information about breaches found may be obtained from other public sources that are deemed reliable.

Claims concerning expropriation are classified as “direct” or “indirect” according to the characterisation made by the claimant and/or the tribunal. Whenever a claimant or the tribunal refer to “expropriation”, without distinguishing between “direct” or “indirect”, such distinction is made on the basis of the factual background of the case and the context of the claimant’s claims and tribunal’s findings.

Composition of tribunal
These are individuals who serve as members of the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the dispute (arbitrators).

The disputing party (i.e. claimant or respondent) that appointed a particular arbitrator is also recorded insofar as information is available. Instances where the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator, and the latter was appointed by an “appointing authority”, are not recorded separately (i.e. both types of appointment are recorded under “Appointed by / designated to Respondent” without further distinction).

In case an arbitrator has been replaced by another individual (e.g. as a result of resignation, disqualification or passing away), the names of both the previous and subsequent arbitrator are recorded.

Follow-on (post-award) proceedings
Follow-on (post-award) proceedings include three types of legal proceedings:

• ICSID annulment proceedings;

• Judicial review by national courts (set-aside proceedings); and

• ICSID resubmission proceedings.

Initiation of a follow-on proceeding by either disputing party does not affect the field “Case Status/Outcome” of the original proceeding, until the follow-on proceeding is completed. For example, in a case where a final award has been rendered but it is later subject to a follow-on proceeding (e.g. ICSID annulment proceeding), the status of the case is marked according to the outcome of the original arbitral proceeding (i.e. not as “Pending”).

Decisions, judgments and/or awards rendered in the course of follow-on (post-award) proceedings, as well as any individual opinions appended to them, are recorded.

The composition of the ICSID ad hoc committees that adjudicate requests for annulment under the ICSID Convention is recorded.

Link to Italaw’s case page
The Italaw.com portal offers a wide collection of case documentation for many investor-State disputes. It makes available not only the main arbitral decisions, but also procedural orders, parties’ submissions, expert opinions and other types of documents.

A link to the relevant case page at http://italaw.com is provided where such page is available, so that users could browse all documents relating to the case at hand.

Additional information
This section provides links to sources of information used for gathering data for the case at hand or otherwise relevant to that case. These may include links to websites of arbitral/administering institutions, governments, international organisations, specialised reporting services (including subscription-based), media and other resources.

Home >
Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator

Advanced Search

Case name and number

Results: 1050

Year

Results: 0

Countries

Results: 148

Economic sector and subsector

Results: 0

Applicable IIA

Results: 0

Arbitral rules and administering institution

Results: 0

Arbitrators and annulment committee members

Results: 0

Amount of compensation (USD or USD equivalent)

Results: 0

Breaches of IIA provisions alleged and found

Results: 0

Follow-on proceedings

Results: 0

Case name

Case number

Clear selection

NO.	Year of initiation	Short case name	Full case name	Applicable IIA	Arbitral rules	Administering institution	Summary	Details of investment	Outcome of original proceedings	Respondent State	Home State of investor	Economic sector	Economic subsector	Arbitrators	Amount claimed	Amount awarded (or settled for)	Breaches alleged	Breaches found	Decisions	Individual opinions	Follow-on proceeding type	Follow-on proceeding status	Follow-on decisions	Follow-on individual opinions	ICSID annulment committee members
1	2023	Baltjura-Serviss v. Norway	SIA Baltjura-Serviss v. Kingdom of Norway (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/7)	Latvia - Norway BIT (1992)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Norway	Latvia	Primary: A - Agriculture, forestry and fishing	3 - Fishing and aquaculture	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 24 June 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
2	2023	British Caribbean Bank and Prize v. Belize (II)	British Caribbean Bank Limited & Prize Holdings International Limited v. The Government of Belize (II) (PCA Case No. 2023-38)	Belize - United Kingdom BIT (1982)	UNCITRAL	PCA	Investment: Summary:		Settled	Belize	United Kingdom	Tertiary: F - Construction	42 - Civil engineering	Kalicki, J. E. - President Sachs, K. - Claimant Levine, J. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Data not available	Data not available	None	None	None	None	None
3	2023	EMS Shipping v. Albania	EMS Shipping & Trading GmbH v. Republic of Albania (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/9)	Albania - Germany BIT (1991)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Concession agreement for the management, operation and maintenance of the Durrës Port East Terminal. Summary:	Concession agreement for the management, operation and maintenance of the Durrës Port East Terminal.	Settled	Albania	Germany	Tertiary: H - Transportation and storage	52 - Warehousing and support activities for transportation	Kaufmann-Kohler, G. - President Alexandrov, S. A. - Claimant van den Berg, A. J. - Respondent	40.00 mln EUR (44.10 mln USD)	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding dated 13 August 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
4	2023	Enerflex and Exterran v. Mexico	Enerflex US Holdings Inc. and Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/22)	NAFTA (1992) USMCA (2018)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Mexico	United States of America	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Jiménez Figueres, D. - President Schill, S. - Claimant González Napolitano, S. - Respondent	120.00 mln USD	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar National treatment Most-favoured nation treatment	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 3 June 2024 (English) Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 3 June 2024 (Spanish)	None	None	None	None	None	None
5	2023	NGE and Leduc v. Senegal	NGE Contracting and Leduc v. Republic of Senegal (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/51)	France - Senegal BIT (2007)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Senegal	France	Tertiary: F - Construction	42 - Civil engineering	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order for the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 27 May 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
6	2023	Sepadeve v. Mexico	Sepadeve International LLC v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/6)	NAFTA (1992) USMCA (2018)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Mexico	United States of America	Tertiary: H - Transportation and storage	52 - Warehousing and support activities for transportation	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 56 dated 8 September 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
7	2022	Addiko Bank v. Slovenia	Addiko Bank AG v. Republic of Slovenia (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/9)	Austria - Slovenia BIT (2001)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in banking services and debt instruments. Summary: Claims arising out of Slovenia’s 2022 law limiting and distributing currency risk among creditors and borrowers of loans in Swiss francs, which requires lenders to adjust CHF loan agreements concluded between 2004 and 2010.	Investments in banking services and debt instruments.	Discontinued	Slovenia	Austria	Tertiary: K - Financial and insurance activities	64 - Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding	Name not available - President Reichert, K. - Claimant van Houtte, H. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 2 February 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
8	2022	Al Kubra v. Libya	Al Kubra v. Libya	Libya - Tunisia BIT (2005)	Ad hoc	Data not available	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Libya	Tunisia	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Termination order dated 10 July 2023	None	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available
9	2022	Arctic Fishing v. Norway	UAB Arctic Fishing v. Kingdom of Norway (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/31)	Lithuania - Norway BIT (1992)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in three snow crab-fishing vessels with fishing rights in maritime zones administered by Norway. Summary: Claims arising out of Government authorities’ interference with the claimant’s snow crab harvesting business, including through the arrest of the claimant’s fishing vessels “Jūros Vilkas” and the dispossession of the claimant’s fishing rights.	Investments in three snow crab-fishing vessels with fishing rights in maritime zones administered by Norway.	Discontinued	Norway	Lithuania	Primary: A - Agriculture, forestry and fishing	3 - Fishing and aquaculture	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 16 July 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
10	2022	Astronergy v. Bulgaria	Astronergy Solar Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/32)	The Energy Charter Treaty (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in photovoltaic power plants through Astronergy Solar Bulgaria Ltd. Summary:	Investments in photovoltaic power plants through Astronergy Solar Bulgaria Ltd.	Discontinued	Bulgaria	Netherlands	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 56 dated 18 August 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
11	2022	CB&I v. Colombia	CB&I UK Limited v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/11)	Colombia - United Kingdom BIT (2010)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Colombia	United Kingdom	Secondary: C - Manufacturing	19 - Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products	Radicati di Brozolo, L. - President Hanotiau, B. - Claimant Mourre, A. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 30 April 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
12	2022	Consolidated Water v. Mexico	Consolidated Water Coöperatief, U.A. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/6)	Mexico - Netherlands BIT (1998)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments through local subsidiaries, N.S.C. Agua, S.A. de C.V. and Aguas de Rosarito, S.A.P.I. de C.V., in a seawater desalination plant project in Playas de Rosarito, Mexico. Summary: Claims arising out of Mexican state entities’ termination of a public-private partnership agreement with the claimant’s subsidiary, Aguas de Rosarito, related to the development of a seawater desalination plant.	Investments through local subsidiaries, N.S.C. Agua, S.A. de C.V. and Aguas de Rosarito, S.A.P.I. de C.V., in a seawater desalination plant project in Playas de Rosarito, Mexico.	Settled	Mexico	Netherlands	Tertiary: E - Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities	36 - Water collection, treatment and supply	Data not available	57.60 mln USD	36.40 mln USD	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 31 May 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
13	2022	Encavis and others v. France	Encavis AG, Capital Stage Solar IPP GmbH, Société Centrale Photovoltaique d'Avon les Roches SAS and Le Communal Est Ouest SARL v. French Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/22)	The Energy Charter Treaty (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in a renewable energy generation enterprise. Summary:	Investments in a renewable energy generation enterprise.	Discontinued	France	Germany	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 24 April 2024 (English) Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 24 April 2024 (French)	None	None	None	None	None	None
14	2022	Halevi v. Czechia	Asael Halevi v. Czech Republic (PCA Case No. 2022-33)	Czech Republic - Israel BIT (1997)	UNCITRAL	None	Investment: Shareholding in a land development project in Prague-Ďáblice. Summary: Claims arising out of a court ruling which allegedly resulted in the expropriation of land plots intended for a development project in which the claimant had invested.	Shareholding in a land development project in Prague-Ďáblice.	Decided in favour of State	Czechia	Israel	Tertiary: L - Real estate activities	68 - Real estate activities	Reed, L. - President Reichert, K. - Claimant Wordsworth, S. - Respondent	165.00 mln CZK (6.90 mln USD)	Data not available	Direct expropriation Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar	None - all claims dismissed at the merits stage	Final Award dated 12 December 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
15	2022	Moussaieff v. Panama	Yoram Moussaieff v. Republic of Panama (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/26)	Panama - United States of America BIT (1982)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Concession contracts for three hydroelectric power plant projects (LALIN I, II and III) held respectively by Panama Power Energy Inc., Panama Energy Finance Inc. and Panama Energy Business Inc. Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s 2017 termination of concession contracts for the construction and operation of three hydroelectric plants at the Gatú and Chorrillo rivers, in which the claimant had invested.	Concession contracts for three hydroelectric power plant projects (LALIN I, II and III) held respectively by Panama Power Energy Inc., Panama Energy Finance Inc. and Panama Energy Business Inc.	Discontinued	Panama	United States of America	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Tirado, J. - President Grigera Naón, H. A. - Claimant Guglielmino, O. C. - Respondent	150.00 mln USD	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 5 July 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
16	2022	Ozkartallar and Campak v. Pakistan	Ozkartallar Inşaat Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. and Campak Temizlik Bilgi Işlem Otomasyon Saglik Hizmetleri Iletişim Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/16)	Pakistan - Turkey BIT (1995)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Rights under a contract for waste management services concluded with state-owned Lahore Waste Management Company. Summary:	Rights under a contract for waste management services concluded with state-owned Lahore Waste Management Company.	Settled	Pakistan	Türkiye	Tertiary: E - Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities	36 - Water collection, treatment and supply	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1) dated 13 December 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
17	2022	Westmoreland v. Canada (III)	Westmoreland Coal Company v. Canada (III) (ICSID Case No. UNCT/23/2)	NAFTA (1992) USMCA (2018)	UNCITRAL	ICSID	Investment: Ownership of several coal mines servicing adjacent power plants through mine-mouth operations in the Province of Alberta, Canada. Summary: Claims arising out of the decision of Alberta’s provincial government in 2015 to phase out coal-fired power plants in the province by 2030. The government allegedly failed to compensate the claimant for the early closure of its coal mining operations, excluding it from a compensation scheme made available to three local coal mining operators.	Ownership of several coal mines servicing adjacent power plants through mine-mouth operations in the Province of Alberta, Canada.	Decided in favour of State	Canada	United States of America	Primary: B - Mining and quarrying	5 - Mining of coal and lignite	Kaufmann-Kohler, G. - President Shore, L. - Claimant Levine, J. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims National treatment	None - jurisdiction declined	Award dated 17 December 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
18	2022	Wu v. Panama	Samson Wu v. Republic of Panama (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/5)	Panama - United States of America BIT (1982)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Panama	United States of America	Tertiary: E - Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities	36 - Water collection, treatment and supply	Torterola, I. - President Gonzalez de Cossio, F. - Claimant Paitan Contreras, C. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding dated 13 February 2023 (Spanish)	None	None	None	None	None	None
19	2021	Anglo American v. Colombia	Anglo American plc v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/31)	Colombia - United Kingdom BIT (2010)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Shareholding of 33.3% in Cerrejón, a joint venture company operating the La Puente coal mining project in northern Colombia. Summary: Claims arising out of an order of Colombia’s constitutional court to suspend Cerrejón’s partial modification of Bruno creek, a water stream that passes through the La Puente mining project area.	Shareholding of 33.3% in Cerrejón, a joint venture company operating the La Puente coal mining project in northern Colombia.	Discontinued	Colombia	United Kingdom	Primary: B - Mining and quarrying	5 - Mining of coal and lignite	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 1 July 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
20	2021	Earlyguard v. India	Earlyguard Limited v. India	India - United Kingdom BIT (1994)	Data not available	Data not available	Investment: Summary:		Settled	India	United Kingdom	Primary: B - Mining and quarrying	7 - Mining of metal ores	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Data not available	Data not available	None	None	None	None	None
21	2021	Enel v. Costa Rica	Enel Colombia S.A. (formerly ESSA2 SpA) and Enel Green Power Costa Rica S.A. v. Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/49)	Chile - Costa Rica BIT (1996)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in hydroelectric power plants. Summary:	Investments in hydroelectric power plants.	Settled	Costa Rica	Chile	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	van den Berg, A. J. - President Eljuri, E. - Claimant Vinuesa, R. E. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 25 April 2023 (English) Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 25 April 2023 (Spanish)	None	None	None	None	None	None
22	2021	Everyway v. Ghana	Beijing Everyway Traffic & Lighting Tech. Co., Ltd v. Republic of Ghana (PCA Case No. 2021-15)	China - Ghana BIT (1989)	UNCITRAL	PCA	Investment: Contract with the Ministry of Roads and Highways for the engineering and installation of a traffic management system in Accra. Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s cancellation of a contract with the claimant to install an intelligent traffic management system, including alleged non-payment for works conducted by the claimant.	Contract with the Ministry of Roads and Highways for the engineering and installation of a traffic management system in Accra.	Decided in favour of State	Ghana	China	Tertiary: F - Construction	43 - Specialized construction activities	Brekoulakis, S. - President Rajah, V. K. - Claimant Oppong, R. - Respondent	55.00 mln USD	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Umbrella clause Direct expropriation Most-favoured nation treatment	None - jurisdiction declined	Final Award on Jurisdiction (Save as to Costs) dated 30 January 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
23	2021	Finetis v. Morocco	Finetis SARL and Finetis Maroc SA v. Kingdom of Morocco (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/44)	France - Morocco BIT (1996)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in the construction and operation of a high-speed telecommunications infrastructure. Summary:	Investments in the construction and operation of a high-speed telecommunications infrastructure.	Decided in favour of State	Morocco	France	Tertiary: J - Information and communication	61 - Telecommunications	Hanotiau, B. - President Mantilla-Serrano, F. - Claimant Boisson de Chazournes, L. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Award dated 4 October 2024	None	None	None	None	None	None
24	2021	GEB and Trecsa v. Guatemala (II)	Grupo Energía Bogotá S.A. E.S.P. and Transportadora de Energía de Centroamérica S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala (II) (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/59)	Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras FTA (2007)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Rights under a contract with the government for the construction, operation and maintenance of electricity transmission lines. Summary:	Rights under a contract with the government for the construction, operation and maintenance of electricity transmission lines.	Discontinued	Guatemala	Colombia	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply Tertiary: F - Construction	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply 42 - Civil engineering	Siqueiros, E. - President Mourre, A. - Claimant Ramírez Hernández, R. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Data not available	Data not available	None	None	None	None	None
25	2021	Interconexión v. Chile	Interconexión Eléctrica S.A. E.S.P. v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/27)	Chile - Colombia FTA (2006)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Shareholding in ISA Inversiones Chile SpA and ISA Interchile S.A., holding a concession for the construction and operation of the “Nueva Línea Cardones-Polpaico” electricity transmission project. Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s decision to impose fines on ISA Interchile, the claimant’s local subsidiary, for alleged delays in the construction of the Cardones-Polpaico electricity transmission project.	Shareholding in ISA Inversiones Chile SpA and ISA Interchile S.A., holding a concession for the construction and operation of the “Nueva Línea Cardones-Polpaico” electricity transmission project.	Decided in favour of investor	Chile	Colombia	Tertiary: F - Construction Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	42 - Civil engineering 35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	González García, L. - Claimant Pinsolle, P. - Respondent Núñez-Lagos, C. - President	221.40 mln USD	16.10 mln USD	Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar	Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims	Award dated 13 December 2024 (Spanish)	Partial Dissent by Luis González García (Spanish)	None	None	None	None	None

No results found

No.	Name	Cases as Respondent State	Cases as Home State of claimant
1	Albania	14	1
2	Algeria	13	2
3	Angola	1	0
4	Argentina	65	5
5	Armenia	7	0
6	Australia	6	13
7	Austria	1	32
8	Azerbaijan	7	1
9	Bahamas	0	2
10	Bahrain	4	1
11	Bangladesh	1	0
12	Barbados	1	7
13	Belarus	5	2
14	Belgium	4	22
15	Belize	4	0
16	Benin	1	0
17	Bermuda	0	1
18	Bolivia, Plurinational State of	19	1
19	Bosnia and Herzegovina	5	0
20	British Virgin Islands	0	1
21	Bulgaria	13	3
22	Burkina Faso	1	0
23	Burundi	4	0
24	Cabo Verde	1	0
25	Cambodia	1	0
26	Cameroon	3	0
27	Canada	36	76
28	Chile	8	10
29	China	9	20
30	Colombia	25	5
31	Congo	3	0
32	Congo, Democratic Republic of the	4	0
33	Costa Rica	14	2
34	Croatia	20	3
35	Cuba	1	0
36	Cyprus	5	38
37	Czechia	43	7
38	Denmark	2	9
39	Dominican Republic	11	2
40	Ecuador	30	0
41	Egypt	48	7
42	El Salvador	4	1
43	Equatorial Guinea	2	0
44	Estonia	5	3
45	Ethiopia	6	0
46	European Union	2	0
47	Finland	3	3
48	France	3	68
49	Gabon	3	0
50	Gambia	2	0
51	Georgia	18	1
52	Germany	7	87
53	Ghana	3	0
54	Gibraltar	0	2
55	Greece	5	16
56	Grenada	2	0
57	Guatemala	9	1
58	Guyana	1	0
59	Honduras	10	0
60	Hong Kong, China SAR	0	2
61	Hungary	18	4
62	India	30	12
63	Indonesia	7	0
64	Iran, Islamic Republic of	1	6
65	Iraq	6	0
66	Ireland	0	2
67	Israel	0	8
68	Italy	14	53
69	Jamaica	0	1
70	Japan	1	6
71	Jordan	10	9
72	Kazakhstan	20	7
73	Kenya	1	1
74	Korea, Republic of	10	8
75	Kuwait	7	9
76	Kyrgyzstan	18	1
77	Lao People's Democratic Republic	4	0
78	Latvia	10	5
79	Lebanon	6	6
80	Lesotho	2	0
81	Libya	23	1
82	Liechtenstein	0	1
83	Lithuania	8	8
84	Luxembourg	1	47
85	Macao, China SAR	0	1
86	Madagascar	4	0
87	Malaysia	3	9
88	Malta	1	5
89	Mauritius	4	17
90	Mexico	56	7
91	Moldova, Republic of	13	1
92	Mongolia	6	0
93	Montenegro	6	0
94	Morocco	9	0
95	Mozambique	5	0
96	Myanmar	2	0
97	Nepal	1	0
98	Netherlands	4	135
99	Nicaragua	3	0
100	Nigeria	5	0
101	North Macedonia	11	0
102	Norway	3	6
103	Oman	4	2
104	Pakistan	12	0
105	Panama	23	10
106	Papua New Guinea	1	0
107	Paraguay	3	0
108	Peru	35	5
109	Philippines	8	1
110	Poland	40	8
111	Portugal	1	9
112	Qatar	3	9
113	Romania	27	1
114	Russian Federation	33	28
115	Rwanda	2	0
116	Saudi Arabia	11	8
117	Senegal	6	0
118	Serbia	16	0
119	Seychelles	0	2
120	Sierra Leone	1	0
121	Singapore	0	14
122	Slovakia	14	1
123	Slovenia	6	3
124	South Africa	1	3
125	Spain	58	77
126	Sri Lanka	5	0
127	Sudan	2	0
128	Sweden	1	15
129	Switzerland	1	52
130	Syrian Arab Republic	2	0
131	Tajikistan	2	0
132	Tanzania, United Republic of	14	0
133	Thailand	2	0
134	Trinidad and Tobago	3	0
135	Tunisia	4	2
136	Türkiye	19	51
137	Turkmenistan	17	0
138	Uganda	1	0
139	Ukraine	33	18
140	United Arab Emirates	7	13
141	United Kingdom	1	120
142	United States of America	24	234
143	Uruguay	7	1
144	Uzbekistan	9	1
145	Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of	65	3
146	Viet Nam	13	0
147	Yemen	3	0
148	Zimbabwe	3	0

No results found

Top

Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator

Known treaty-based ISDS cases:

About

Methodology

Disclaimer

Cases included in the Navigator

Sources of information and frequency of updating

Methodological notes for the recording of data

Share

Case name and number

Year

Countries

Economic sector and subsector

Applicable IIA

Arbitral rules and administering institution

Arbitrators and annulment committee members

Amount of compensation (USD or USD equivalent)

Breaches of IIA provisions alleged and found

Follow-on proceedings

Arbitrations initiated

Arbitral decisions issued

Follow-on decisions issued

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

BITs

Treaties with Investment Provisions

Year of signature

Applicable arbitration rules

Administering institution

Appointments in original proceedings

ICSID annulment committee members

Appointed by claimant

Appointed by / Designated to Respondent

President

Sole arbitrator

Sought by claimant(s)

Awarded by tribunal

Agreed in settlement

Breaches of IIA provisions alleged

Breaches of IIA provisions found

ICSID annulment proceedings

Judicial review by national courts

ICSID resubmission proceedings