Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator

Concluded original arbitration proceedings:

About

Open this in NEW TAB
ISDS data set in excel format (as of 31 July 2022)

ISDS Navigator

The UNCTAD Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator – the ISDS Navigator – is maintained by UNCTAD’s IIA Section. The ISDS Navigator contains information about known international arbitration cases initiated by investors against States pursuant to international investment agreements (IIAs). Such arbitrations are also referred to as treaty-based investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) cases.

Please cite as: UNCTAD, Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator, available at https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement

UNCTAD's Work Programme on International Investment Agreements (IIAs) actively assists policymakers, government officials and other IIA stakeholders to reform IIAs with a view to making them more conducive to sustainable development and inclusive growth.

International investment rulemaking is taking place at the bilateral, regional, interregional and multilateral levels. It requires policymakers, negotiators, civil society and other stakeholders to be well informed about foreign direct investment, international investment agreements (IIAs) and their impact on sustainable development.

Main goals of UNCTAD’s Work Programme on IIAs

• Reform the international investment agreements (IIAs) regime to enhance its sustainable development dimension,

• Provide comprehensive analysis on key issues arising from the complexity of the international investment regime,

• Develop a wide range of tools to support the formulation of more balanced international investment policies.

The three pillars of activities

• Research and policy analysis: monitoring trends, identifying key emerging issues and providing cutting-edge knowledge on IIAs from a sustainable development perspective,

• Technical assistance: delivering trainings, seminars and workshops; conducting IIA and model BIT reviews; offering ad-hoc advice to strengthen the capacity of beneficiaries in handling the complexities of the IIA regime,

• Intergovernmental consensus-building: exchanging and sharing best practices and experience with the view to fostering global investment governance.

For further information, please contact us via the online contact form.
Methodology

Open this in NEW TAB

Disclaimer

The ISDS Navigator includes information about publicly known IIA-based international investor-State arbitration proceedings. As some proceedings (or certain aspects of proceedings) remain confidential, the information contained in the Navigator cannot be deemed exhaustive.

While every effort is made to keep the information up to date and complete, the material is provided without any guarantees or warranties as to its accuracy or completeness. UNCTAD assumes no responsibility for eventual errors or omissions in these data.

We welcome any additional information or clarifications on specific cases as well as suggestions to improve the Navigator. Please contact us using the online contact form.

Cases included in the Navigator

• an international arbitration between an investor and a State;

• fully or partially based on an IIA, such as a bilateral investment treaty or the investment chapter of a free trade agreement (not included are investor-State disputes that are solely based on contracts or on domestic investment legislation);

• submitted to arbitration through a notice of arbitration or a request for arbitration, and upon registration of such request if applicable (not included are cases where a disputing party has only notified the other party of the existence of a dispute or signalled its intention to submit a claim, but has not yet commenced the arbitration).

Sources of information and frequency of updating

The information included in the Navigator is collected from publicly available sources. Primary sources (i.e. official documents relating to the case and information provided by the administering institutions) are the main and preferred source of information. Secondary sources, such as specialized reporting services and other sources deemed reliable, are used to supplement primary sources and/or obtain case information otherwise unavailable.
The Navigator is updated on a regular, typically biannual, basis. The date of the last update is displayed on the Navigator’s home page.

Methodological notes for the recording of data

Full case name
The full case name is recorded as it appears in the official case documents and as it is registered at the administering institution if applicable (listing the claimants in alphabetical order). If there are more than five claimants in the case, the names of all claimants can be replaced by the name of the first three claimants followed by the words “and others”.

Short case name
The short case name is ascribed by UNCTAD. Typically it is the first word of a corporate claimant’s name, an abbreviation of the corporate claimant’s name, or the last name of a natural-person claimant “v.” the short version of the respondent State’s name.

If the Navigator includes more than one case with the exact same name, then “(I)” is added to the case name of the earlier case, and a “(II)”, “(III)”, etc. is added to the name of each subsequent case.

Year of initiation
This is the year in which the notice of arbitration / request for arbitration was submitted by the claimant. For arbitrations brought under the ICSID Convention Arbitration Rules or ICSID Additional Facilities (AF) Rules, the year in which the claim was registered by ICSID is used.

Applicable IIA
This is the IIA(s) pursuant to which the claimant initiated the arbitral proceedings.

Arbitral rules
These are the arbitral rules in accordance with which the proceedings are conducted. Proceedings that are not subject to any existing set of arbitral rules, i.e. where the arbitral tribunal determines procedural rules, are marked “None (ad hoc)”.

Administering institution
This is the institution that provides administrative support for the arbitral proceedings. When the proceedings are subject to arbitral rules of a certain arbitral institution (e.g. SCC or ICC), the relevant institution administers that case. In ad hoc arbitrations or those that are subject to non-institutional arbitral rules (e.g. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules), the parties may request any arbitral institution to administer their case (e.g. PCA). Proceedings may also be conducted without being administered by any institution.

Common abbreviations for administering institutions:

• CRCICA: Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration
• ICC: International Chamber of Commerce (International Court of Arbitration)
• ICSID: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
• LCIA: London Court of International Arbitration
• MCCI: Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry
• PCA: Permanent Court of Arbitration
• SCC: Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (Arbitration Institute)

Details of investment and summary of the dispute
The details of investment are presented as argued by the claimant, unless otherwise expressly identified by an arbitral tribunal in its decisions or awards.

The summary of the dispute describes in very general terms the conduct allegedly in breach of IIA obligations as argued by the claimant (non-exhaustive).

Economic sector and subsector
This refers to the economic sector to which the investment at issue allegedly belongs. The structure of economic activities follows the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Rev.4 (UN ISIC Rev.4).

Status/Outcome of original proceedings
This refers to the current status of the original arbitration proceedings.

• Decided in favour of State: the tribunal dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction or found that the respondent State has not committed any breach of the applicable IIA.

• Decided in favour of investor: the tribunal found that the respondent State committed one or more breaches of the applicable IIA and awarded monetary compensation or non-pecuniary relief to the claimant investor.

• Decided in favour of neither party (liability found but no damages awarded): the arbitral tribunal found that the respondent State committed one or more breaches of the applicable IIA but did not award monetary compensation or non-pecuniary relief to the claimant investor.

• Settled: the disputing parties settled the case and the arbitral proceedings were discontinued for that reason.

• Discontinued: the arbitration was discontinued for any reason other than due to a (known) settlement. This includes discontinuance as a result of non-payment of arbitration fees, in order to pursue litigation in another forum, or for any other reason (including for unknown reasons).

• Pending: the arbitration proceedings are pending. A case remains pending if any of the following elements remain to be decided: jurisdiction, liability (merits), compensation. The case remains pending, for instance, if a State is found to have breached one or more IIA obligations (liability) but no award on damages has been issued yet.

Additional notes:

• The Navigator only records treaty-based disputes or treaty-based aspects of "mixed" disputes. In treaty-based cases that are simultaneously contract-based or based on national investment law ("mixed" disputes), a case is deemed concluded (for purposes of the Navigator) if the tribunal dismissed the case on jurisdiction or finds no breach of the IIA, even if it proceeds to adjudicate the contract- or statutory-based claims.

• Cases in which a final award has been rendered but which are later subject to follow-on (post-award) proceedings (e.g. ICSID annulment proceedings or domestic judicial review), are marked according to the outcome of the original arbitral proceeding (i.e. not as “Pending”).

Arbitral decisions rendered
These are decisions rendered by an arbitral tribunal. Included are those decisions that concern the substance of the case and affect the final outcome. In particular, these include decisions (awards) on jurisdictional issues, liability (merits) and damages, including arbitrators’ individual opinions where these were issued. Discontinuance orders and settlement agreements are also recorded if such information is available.

Not included are any other (supplementary) arbitral decisions, e.g. concerning provisional measures or decisions regarding requests for disqualification of arbitrators. Similarly, procedural orders issued by arbitral tribunals are not included. To access a full list of documentation available with respect to a case, users are invited to use (i) the link to the case page on http://italaw.com, and/or (ii) links to the websites of governments and/or arbitral institutions provided in the “Additional information” section.

Amounts claimed and awarded
Amount claimed refers to the amount of monetary compensation claimed by the investor, not including interest, legal costs or costs of arbitration.

Amount awarded refers to the amount of monetary compensation awarded by the arbitral tribunal to the claimant, not including interest, legal costs or costs of arbitration.

For proceedings that end in a settlement, the amount of compensation that the State agreed to pay to the claimant under the terms of settlement (if known) is recorded in this section.

Amounts are recorded in the currency used by the claimant/tribunal. The list of currencies in the Navigator follows the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4217 code list.

To enable comparisons between cases, all amounts are also converted to US dollars. For the purposes of such conversion, the OANDA Historical Currency Converter is being used; the date of conversion is the date of the document or other source from which the information was obtained (e.g. the date in which the request for arbitration containing this amount was submitted or the date of the final award).

Whenever possible, information about amounts claimed and awarded is obtained from primary sources such as the arbitration documents. Otherwise, it is derived from other publicly available sources that are deemed reliable. In some cases, the approximate amount may be recorded to give a broad indication of the dispute’s magnitude. As a general rule, a rounded figure (to the nearest hundred thousand) of the amount claimed or awarded is provided.

If the claimant provides more than one valuation of damages claimed, the highest of these amounts is recorded.

IIA breaches alleged and found
Information about breaches alleged is primarily derived from the claimant’s request of arbitration, claimant’s memorials and/or arbitral decisions. When the relevant case documentation is not publicly available, information about breaches alleged may be obtained from other public sources that are deemed reliable.

Information about breaches found is primarily derived from the arbitral decisions. When the relevant decision is not publicly available, information about breaches found may be obtained from other public sources that are deemed reliable.

Claims concerning expropriation are classified as “direct” or “indirect” according to the characterisation made by the claimant and/or the tribunal. Whenever a claimant or the tribunal refer to “expropriation”, without distinguishing between “direct” or “indirect”, such distinction is made on the basis of the factual background of the case and the context of the claimant’s claims and tribunal’s findings.

Composition of tribunal
These are individuals who serve as members of the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the dispute (arbitrators).

The disputing party (i.e. claimant or respondent) that appointed a particular arbitrator is also recorded insofar as information is available. Instances where the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator, and the latter was appointed by an “appointing authority”, are not recorded separately (i.e. both types of appointment are recorded under “Appointed by / designated to Respondent” without further distinction).

In case an arbitrator has been replaced by another individual (e.g. as a result of resignation, disqualification or passing away), the names of both the previous and subsequent arbitrator are recorded.

Follow-on (post-award) proceedings
Follow-on (post-award) proceedings include three types of legal proceedings:

• ICSID annulment proceedings;

• Judicial review by national courts (set-aside proceedings); and

• ICSID resubmission proceedings.

Initiation of a follow-on proceeding by either disputing party does not affect the field “Case Status/Outcome” of the original proceeding, until the follow-on proceeding is completed. For example, in a case where a final award has been rendered but it is later subject to a follow-on proceeding (e.g. ICSID annulment proceeding), the status of the case is marked according to the outcome of the original arbitral proceeding (i.e. not as “Pending”).

Decisions, judgments and/or awards rendered in the course of follow-on (post-award) proceedings, as well as any individual opinions appended to them, are recorded.

The composition of the ICSID ad hoc committees that adjudicate requests for annulment under the ICSID Convention is recorded.

Link to Italaw’s case page
The Italaw.com portal offers a wide collection of case documentation for many investor-State disputes. It makes available not only the main arbitral decisions, but also procedural orders, parties’ submissions, expert opinions and other types of documents.

A link to the relevant case page at http://italaw.com is provided where such page is available, so that users could browse all documents relating to the case at hand.

Additional information
This section provides links to sources of information used for gathering data for the case at hand or otherwise relevant to that case. These may include links to websites of arbitral/administering institutions, governments, international organisations, specialised reporting services (including subscription-based), media and other resources.

Home >
Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator

Advanced Search

Case name and number

Results: 128

Year

Results: 0

Countries

Results: 146

Economic sector and subsector

Results: 0

Applicable IIA

Results: 0

Arbitral rules and administering institution

Results: 0

Arbitrators and annulment committee members

Results: 0

Amount of compensation (USD or USD equivalent)

Results: 0

Breaches of IIA provisions alleged and found

Results: 0

Follow-on proceedings

Results: 0

Case name

Case number

Clear selection

NO.	Year of initiation	Short case name	Full case name	Applicable IIA	Arbitral rules	Administering institution	Summary	Details of investment	Outcome of original proceedings	Respondent State	Home State of investor	Economic sector	Economic subsector	Arbitrators	Amount claimed	Amount awarded (or settled for)	Breaches alleged	Breaches found	Decisions	Individual opinions	Follow-on proceeding type	Follow-on proceeding status	Follow-on decisions	Follow-on individual opinions	ICSID annulment committee members
1	2023	Sepadeve v. Mexico	Sepadeve International LLC v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/6)	NAFTA (1992) USMCA (2018)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Mexico	United States of America	Tertiary: H - Transportation and storage	52 - Warehousing and support activities for transportation	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 56 dated 8 September 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
2	2022	Astronergy v. Bulgaria	Astronergy Solar Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/32)	The Energy Charter Treaty (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in photovoltaic power plants through Astronergy Solar Bulgaria Ltd. Summary:	Investments in photovoltaic power plants through Astronergy Solar Bulgaria Ltd.	Discontinued	Bulgaria	Netherlands	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 56 dated 18 August 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
3	2022	Wu v. Panama	Samson Wu v. Republic of Panama (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/5)	Panama - United States of America BIT (1982)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Panama	United States of America	Tertiary: E - Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities	36 - Water collection, treatment and supply	Torterola, I. - President Gonzalez de Cossio, F. - Claimant Paitan Contreras, C. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding dated 13 February 2023 (Spanish)	None	None	None	None	None	None
4	2021	Anglo American v. Colombia	Anglo American plc v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/31)	Colombia - United Kingdom BIT (2010)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Shareholding of 33.3% in Cerrejón, a joint venture company operating the La Puente coal mining project in northern Colombia. Summary: Claims arising out of an order of Colombia’s constitutional court to suspend Cerrejón’s partial modification of Bruno creek, a water stream that passes through the La Puente mining project area.	Shareholding of 33.3% in Cerrejón, a joint venture company operating the La Puente coal mining project in northern Colombia.	Discontinued	Colombia	United Kingdom	Primary: B - Mining and quarrying	5 - Mining of coal and lignite	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 1 July 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
5	2021	GEB and Trecsa v. Guatemala (II)	Grupo Energía Bogotá S.A. E.S.P. and Transportadora de Energía de Centroamérica S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala (II) (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/59)	Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras FTA (2007)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Rights under a contract with the government for the construction, operation and maintenance of electricity transmission lines. Summary:	Rights under a contract with the government for the construction, operation and maintenance of electricity transmission lines.	Discontinued	Guatemala	Colombia	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply Tertiary: F - Construction	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply 42 - Civil engineering	Siqueiros, E. - President Mourre, A. - Claimant Ramírez Hernández, R. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Data not available	Data not available	None	None	None	None	None
6	2021	L1bre v. Mexico	L1bre Holding, LLC v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/55)	NAFTA (1992) USMCA (2018)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Indirect shareholding in Servicios Digitales Lusad, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Lusad”), a locally incorporated company holding a 10-year concession for the replacement of taximeters in Mexico City. Summary: Claims arising out of a local government’s interference with a concession held by Lusad for digital taximeters and the operation of a mobile taxi application in Mexico City.	Indirect shareholding in Servicios Digitales Lusad, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Lusad”), a locally incorporated company holding a 10-year concession for the replacement of taximeters in Mexico City.	Discontinued	Mexico	United States of America	Tertiary: J - Information and communication	61 - Telecommunications	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar National treatment Most-favoured nation treatment Indirect expropriation	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1) dated 7 March 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
7	2021	Optima v. United States (II)	Optima Ventures LLC and Optima 55 Public Square LLC v. United States of America (II) (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/12)	Ukraine - United States of America BIT (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Ownership of a commercial real estate property known as 55 Public Square in Cleveland, Ohio. Summary: Claims arising out of civil forfeiture proceedings commenced by the U.S. Department of Justice against the claimants’ commercial real estate in Cleveland, in connection with the alleged violation of U.S. money laundering laws.	Ownership of a commercial real estate property known as 55 Public Square in Cleveland, Ohio.	Discontinued	United States of America	Ukraine	Tertiary: L - Real estate activities	68 - Real estate activities	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Direct expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Other Indirect expropriation	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1) dated 16 June 2021	None	None	None	None	None	None
8	2021	PETRONAS and Azhan Bin Ali v. Sudan	PETRONAS International Corporation Ltd and Azhan Bin Ali v. Republic of the Sudan (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/47)	Malaysia - Sudan BIT (1998)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Sudan	Malaysia	Tertiary: L - Real estate activities	68 - Real estate activities	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 45 dated 8 July 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
9	2021	Philip Morris and others v. Ukraine	Philip Morris International Inc. and others v. Ukraine (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/3)	Switzerland - Ukraine BIT (1995) Ukraine - United States of America BIT (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Ukraine	Switzerland United States of America	Secondary: C - Manufacturing	12 - Manufacture of tobacco products	Bethlehem, D. - President Rees, P. - Claimant Stern, B. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 28 January 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
10	2021	RWE v. Netherlands	RWE AG and RWE Eemshaven Holding II BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/4)	The Energy Charter Treaty (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Shareholding of 100% in a coal-fired power plant in Eemshaven held through RWE Eemshaven Holding II BV, and related permits. Summary: Claims arising out of the 2019 law prohibiting the use of coal for electricity production, which requires the shutdown of the claimants’ coal-fired power plant at the end of a 10-year transitional period on 1 January 2030.	Shareholding of 100% in a coal-fired power plant in Eemshaven held through RWE Eemshaven Holding II BV, and related permits.	Discontinued	Netherlands	Germany	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Reed, L. - President Boykin, J. H. - Claimant Landau, T. - Respondent	1400.00 mln EUR (1696.00 mln USD)	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Umbrella clause Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar Arbitrary, unreasonable and/or discriminatory measures	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Data not available	Data not available	None	None	None	None	None
11	2021	Shell v. Nigeria (II)	Shell Petroleum N.V. and The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (II) (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/7)	Netherlands - Nigeria BIT (1992)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Nigeria	Netherlands	Primary: B - Mining and quarrying	6 - Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas	Abdel Wahab, M. S. - President Kaplan, N. - Claimant Banifatemi, Y. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1) dated 13 October 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
12	2021	TS Villalba and others v. Spain	TS Villalba GmbH and others v. Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/43)	The Energy Charter Treaty (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Spain	Germany	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 24 March 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
13	2021	Uniper v. Netherlands	Uniper SE, Uniper Benelux Holding B.V. and Uniper Benelux N.V. v. Kingdom of the Netherlands (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/22)	The Energy Charter Treaty (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Ownership of a coal-fired power plant, Maasvlakte 3, through Uniper Benelux N.V. Summary: Claims arising out of the 2019 law prohibiting the use of coal for electricity production, which requires the shutdown of the claimants’ coal-fired power plant at the end of a 10-year transitional period on 1 January 2030.	Ownership of a coal-fired power plant, Maasvlakte 3, through Uniper Benelux N.V.	Discontinued	Netherlands	Germany	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	King, B. D. - Claimant Kalicki, J. E. - Respondent Cicchetti, T. M. - President	Data not available	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Arbitrary, unreasonable and/or discriminatory measures	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order of the tribunal taking note of the discontinuance of the proceedings and decision on costs dated 17 March 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
14	2021	Visor Mühendislik and Arasli v. Turkmenistan	Visor Mühendislik Insaat Turizm Gida ve Mekanik Elektrik Taahhüt Ticaret Limited Sirketi and Gökhan Arasli v. Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/20)	Turkey - Turkmenistan BIT (1992)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Turkmenistan	Türkiye	Tertiary: F - Construction	41 - Construction of buildings	Tribunal not constituted	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 7 February 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
15	2020	Aleksandravicius v. Denmark	Donatas Aleksandravicius v. Kingdom of Denmark (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/30)	Denmark - Lithuania BIT (1992)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in local construction company, DS Byggeri APS. Summary: Claims arising out of the local police’s failure to take action against labour union protests at a construction site targeting the claimant’s company, DS Byggeri. According to the claimant, the protesters damaged the company’s construction equipment and caused harm to its scaffolding business.	Investments in local construction company, DS Byggeri APS.	Discontinued	Denmark	Lithuania	Tertiary: F - Construction	41 - Construction of buildings	Annacker, C. - President Paulsson, J. - Claimant Hindelang, S. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Full protection and security, or similar	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 19 November 2021	None	None	None	None	None	None
16	2020	Arka Energy v. Albania	Arka Energy B.V. v. Republic of Albania (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/54)	Albania - Netherlands BIT (1994)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in a photovoltaic project through local subsidiary Arkeni Solar sh.p.k. Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s actions related to the Akerni photovoltaic park, a construction project that a consortium involving the claimant’s subsidiary had won through a 2018 international tender process conducted by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy.	Investments in a photovoltaic project through local subsidiary Arkeni Solar sh.p.k.	Discontinued	Albania	Netherlands	Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply	Beechey, J. - President Rowley, J. W. - Claimant Thomas, J. C. - Respondent	110.00 mln EUR (130.50 mln USD)	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Administrative and Financial Regulation 14(3)(d) dated 20 July 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
17	2020	Gesenu v. Egypt	Gesenu S.p.A. v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/45)	Egypt - Italy BIT (1989)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Egypt	Italy	Tertiary: E - Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities	38 - Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery	Malinvaud, C. - President Spigelman, J. - Claimant Simma, B. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1) dated 25 October 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None
18	2020	Hernández Contreras v. Costa Rica (I)	José Alejandro Hernández Contreras v. Republic of Costa Rica (I) (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/20/2)	Costa Rica - Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of BIT (1997)	ICSID AF	ICSID	Investment: Majority shareholding in V-NET, a company holding a public contract for the distribution of telecommunication products. Summary: Claims arising out of the non-renewal by Costa Rica’s electricity regulator, Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE), of a contract with the claimant’s local telecommunications company, V-NET, for the distribution of mobile phone products. According to the claimant, the contract was arbitrarily transferred to a competitor of V-NET.	Majority shareholding in V-NET, a company holding a public contract for the distribution of telecommunication products.	Discontinued	Costa Rica	Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of	Tertiary: J - Information and communication	61 - Telecommunications	Concepcíon, C. F. - Claimant Perezcano Diaz, H. - Respondent Bulnes Serrano, F. - President	25.00 mln USD	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims National treatment Most-favoured nation treatment	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to Article 50 of the ICSID Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules dated 2 March 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
19	2020	Human Rights Defenders v. Switzerland	Human Rights Defenders Inc., as assignee of Natale Palazzo, Rodolfo Scodeller and Antonio Basile v. Swiss Confederation (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/29)	Hungary - Switzerland BIT (1988)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in real estate. Summary: Claims arising out of a federal decree passed by the Swiss Parliament in 1989 banning the sale of real estate property within five years of its purchase and other measures, which allegedly resulted in financial losses for the claimant.	Investments in real estate.	Discontinued	Switzerland	Seychelles	Tertiary: L - Real estate activities	68 - Real estate activities	Bethlehem, D. - President Bottini, G. - Claimant Landau, T. - Respondent	300.00 mln CHF (330.50 mln USD)	Data not available	Indirect expropriation Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Administrative and Financial Regulation 14(3)(d) dated 18 January 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
20	2020	Macro Trading v. China	Macro Trading Co., Ltd. v. People’s Republic of China (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/22)	China - Japan BIT (1988)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in a large-scale property development project. Summary:	Investments in a large-scale property development project.	Discontinued	China	Japan	Tertiary: F - Construction	41 - Construction of buildings	Kaufmann-Kohler, G. - President Sapiro, M. - Claimant Tomka, P. - Respondent (replaced) Knieper, R. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Administrative and Financial Regulation 14(3)(d) dated 10 September 2021	None	None	None	None	None	None
21	2020	Metroplex v. Philippines	Metroplex Berhad v. The Republic of the Philippines (PCA Case No. 2020-30)	ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement (2009)	UNCITRAL	PCA	Investment: Summary:		Discontinued	Philippines	Malaysia	Tertiary: I - Accommodation and food service activities Tertiary: R - Arts, entertainment and recreation	55 - Accommodation 92 - Gambling and betting activities	Name not available - President Name not available - Claimant Name not available - Respondent	100.00 mln USD	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Termination order dated October 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
22	2020	Rabobank v. Mexico	Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/23)	Mexico - Netherlands BIT (1998)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Loans to Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. to finance the purchase of nine vessels for maritime transport services. Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s seizure of maritime shipping company Oceanografía and other measures, which allegedly resulted in the company’s bankruptcy and the loss of the claimant’s investment in Oceanografía undertaken through loans for the purchase of vessels.	Loans to Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. to finance the purchase of nine vessels for maritime transport services.	Discontinued	Mexico	Netherlands	Tertiary: H - Transportation and storage	50 - Water transport	Tribunal not constituted	230.00 mln USD	Data not available	Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Most-favoured nation treatment Indirect expropriation	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 11 January 2022	None	None	None	None	None	None
23	2020	Raiffeisen Bank v. Croatia (II)	Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisen Bank Austria d.d. v. Republic of Croatia (II) (PCA Case No. 2020-15)	Austria - Croatia BIT (1997)	UNCITRAL	PCA	Investment: Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s takeover and restructuring in the form of a “extraordinary administration” of Agrokor Group.		Discontinued	Croatia	Austria	Tertiary: K - Financial and insurance activities	64 - Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding	Greenwood, C. - President Hanotiau, B. - Claimant Murphy, S. D. - Respondent	Data not available	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Data not available	Data not available	None	None	None	None	None
24	2020	Setta Insaat v. Turkmenistan	Setta Insaat Taahhüt Turz. Tekstil Gida San. Ve Tic. AS v. Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/32)	Turkey - Turkmenistan BIT (1992)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Investments in several construction projects in Turkmenistan based on contracts with state entities. Summary: Claims arising out of the Government’s alleged interference with the claimant’s construction projects, including the seizure of the claimant’s machinery and equipment and its ownership rights over certain facilities.	Investments in several construction projects in Turkmenistan based on contracts with state entities.	Discontinued	Turkmenistan	Türkiye	Tertiary: F - Construction	41 - Construction of buildings	Tribunal not constituted	27.00 mln USD	Data not available	Data not available	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1) dated 22 November 2021	None	None	None	None	None	None
25	2020	Worth Capital v. Peru	Worth Capital Holdings 27 LLC v. Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/51)	Peru - United States FTA (2006)	ICSID	ICSID	Investment: Shareholding in Petróleos de la Selva (formerly Maple Gas Corporation), a company operating the Pucallpa oil and gas refinery in the Ucayali region. Summary: Claims arising out of state entities’ alleged obstruction of the claimant’s business activities at the Pucallpa refinery operated by its local company, leading to the refinery’s closure.	Shareholding in Petróleos de la Selva (formerly Maple Gas Corporation), a company operating the Pucallpa oil and gas refinery in the Ucayali region.	Discontinued	Peru	United States of America	Secondary: C - Manufacturing	19 - Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products	Blanch, J. - President Grigera Naón, H. A. - Claimant Knieper, R. - Respondent	136.30 mln USD ( mln USD)	Data not available	Fair and equitable treatment/Minimum standard of treatment, including denial of justice claims Indirect expropriation	Not applicable - settled or discontinued before decision on liability	Order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44 dated 8 December 2023	None	None	None	None	None	None

No results found

No.	Name	Cases as Respondent State	Cases as Home State of claimant
1	Albania	13	1
2	Algeria	13	1
3	Argentina	65	5
4	Armenia	6	0
5	Australia	4	9
6	Austria	1	32
7	Azerbaijan	7	1
8	Bahamas	0	2
9	Bahrain	4	1
10	Bangladesh	1	0
11	Barbados	1	7
12	Belarus	4	2
13	Belgium	3	20
14	Belize	4	0
15	Benin	1	0
16	Bermuda	0	1
17	Bolivia, Plurinational State of	19	1
18	Bosnia and Herzegovina	5	0
19	British Virgin Islands	0	1
20	Bulgaria	12	2
21	Burundi	4	0
22	Cabo Verde	1	0
23	Cambodia	1	0
24	Cameroon	3	0
25	Canada	34	68
26	Chile	7	9
27	China	9	19
28	Colombia	23	4
29	Congo	3	0
30	Congo, Democratic Republic of the	4	0
31	Costa Rica	14	2
32	Croatia	19	3
33	Cuba	1	0
34	Cyprus	5	36
35	Czechia	42	7
36	Denmark	2	9
37	Dominican Republic	11	2
38	Ecuador	29	0
39	Egypt	46	7
40	El Salvador	4	0
41	Equatorial Guinea	2	0
42	Estonia	5	3
43	Ethiopia	5	0
44	European Union	2	0
45	Finland	1	3
46	France	3	67
47	Gabon	3	0
48	Gambia	2	0
49	Georgia	18	1
50	Germany	7	84
51	Ghana	3	0
52	Gibraltar	0	2
53	Greece	5	15
54	Grenada	2	0
55	Guatemala	9	1
56	Guyana	1	0
57	Honduras	7	0
58	Hong Kong, China SAR	0	2
59	Hungary	17	3
60	India	28	12
61	Indonesia	7	0
62	Iran, Islamic Republic of	1	6
63	Iraq	6	0
64	Ireland	0	2
65	Israel	0	8
66	Italy	14	51
67	Jamaica	0	1
68	Japan	1	6
69	Jordan	10	9
70	Kazakhstan	19	7
71	Kenya	1	0
72	Korea, Republic of	10	8
73	Kuwait	7	9
74	Kyrgyzstan	18	0
75	Lao People's Democratic Republic	4	0
76	Latvia	10	5
77	Lebanon	5	6
78	Lesotho	2	0
79	Libya	22	1
80	Liechtenstein	0	1
81	Lithuania	8	8
82	Luxembourg	0	45
83	Macao, China SAR	0	1
84	Madagascar	4	0
85	Malaysia	3	9
86	Malta	1	4
87	Mauritius	4	15
88	Mexico	52	7
89	Moldova, Republic of	13	1
90	Mongolia	6	0
91	Montenegro	6	0
92	Morocco	9	0
93	Mozambique	3	0
94	Myanmar	2	0
95	Nepal	1	0
96	Netherlands	3	132
97	Nicaragua	3	0
98	Nigeria	5	0
99	North Macedonia	11	0
100	Norway	3	5
101	Oman	4	2
102	Pakistan	12	0
103	Panama	20	10
104	Papua New Guinea	1	0
105	Paraguay	3	0
106	Peru	34	5
107	Philippines	7	0
108	Poland	37	8
109	Portugal	1	8
110	Qatar	2	9
111	Romania	26	1
112	Russian Federation	28	26
113	Rwanda	1	0
114	Saudi Arabia	11	5
115	Senegal	6	0
116	Serbia	15	0
117	Seychelles	0	2
118	Sierra Leone	1	0
119	Singapore	0	12
120	Slovakia	14	1
121	Slovenia	6	3
122	South Africa	1	3
123	Spain	56	73
124	Sri Lanka	5	0
125	Sudan	2	0
126	Sweden	1	12
127	Switzerland	1	51
128	Syrian Arab Republic	2	0
129	Tajikistan	2	0
130	Tanzania, United Republic of	13	0
131	Thailand	2	0
132	Trinidad and Tobago	2	0
133	Tunisia	3	1
134	Türkiye	18	49
135	Turkmenistan	16	0
136	Uganda	1	0
137	Ukraine	31	17
138	United Arab Emirates	6	12
139	United Kingdom	1	109
140	United States of America	24	232
141	Uruguay	5	1
142	Uzbekistan	9	1
143	Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of	64	3
144	Viet Nam	13	0
145	Yemen	3	0
146	Zimbabwe	3	0